Home › Forums › Poetry and Narrative Fiction › An Open Moment
- This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 03/16/2023 at 2:52 PM by David Filippone.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 16, 2023 at 2:27 pm #1177
Image: ‘Blue’ by Angeleses – Pixabay https://tinyurl.com/y58gokcs
THE MORNING ME POEM
by Ken MckeonGolden flowers, morning light, and the sky,
For the first time in weeks, bluer than blue,
As I am, a baseless true blue blue,
A doubled up blue, a three scoop blueBalanced on a flimsy ice cream cone,
Bound by a round design,
A well tensioned thin all crusty
Sugared up sweet batter baked somehow
From sky wide open mouth
To a one point finely finite tapered close,I’ll say I am the well splintered me,
The whole me, the nothing but
Infantilized dungeon ready me,
O my, the weakling multiplied
Strong as all get out, the broad
Shake a leg centipede drum head
Tulip farmed acreage tightly
Buttoned up sun spread ease of me,
The petal lift dawn burst break away
Lights out multiple bulb flash all in
Dazzle pointed each nano second here,
Well hairdoed and done and gone so quickly me,
It’s hard to say I was ever here at all. -
March 16, 2023 at 2:52 pm #1178
Sharing the initial CCI Facebook introduction and quote that lead into the poem posted above”
WHERE’S THE OPENNESS?
As TSK students, at some point we’re faced with a perplexity, a pickle, a Catch-22… we want to discover open mind… the blank availability out of which all our thoughts, and feelings arise. So we think about that primordial space… we imagine it. Unfortunately, when we imagine this space, we are creating a thought ABOUT it, which is NOT primordial or zeroless space we seek. Rinpoche writes…
“In order for thoughts to appear… [there is] a blank availability… But just as with physical space, this ‘no-thing’ is in fact the opposite pole of ‘something’: the indispensable prerequisite for substance to arise. Starting from the ‘zero-point’ of thought, points take form as solid, and [the prior] zeroless space disappears into the dichotomy of substance/nothingness… substance proliferates, and the transitional constructions of multidimensional appearance give way to a reality that has already been established.”
“It might seem that we could cut through these complications by going to direct experience, prior to all thoughts. But is this alternative really available? We do seem to experience and act non-conceptually; for example, when we perform a habitual action such as walking without having to think about each step along the way. Yet even if such everyday ‘NO-THOUGHT EXPERIENCES’ are in one sense undeniable, THEY ARE ALSO INACCESSIBLE. AS SOON AS WE FOCUS ON SUCH AN EXPERIENCE, WE MAKE IT AN OBJECT OF THOUGHT AND THUS LOSE THE EXPERIENCE ITSELF. If we claim we can rely on the experience without describing it, this claim is again the product of thought.”
“We are caught in a dilemma… Though there may be awareness without thoughts, it is not clear how this awareness can be transmitted forward into the next moment in order to be known without thereby making it the object of the thinking mind… In its initial arising, its popping up, THOUGHT APPEARS to be dimensionless. Even if a transition to dimensionality follows at once, THERE MUST STILL BE AN INSTANT WHEN THE ARISING THOUGHT IS NOT YET COMMITTED TO ITS CONTENT; WHEN IT REMAINS FREE TO TAKE VIRTUALLY ANY FORM AT ALL.”
“We have grown accustomed to thoughts that establish a world and are themselves established, defined exclusively in terms of their content. But IN THIS INITIAL MOMENT, THE THOUGHT IS UNESTABLISHED, AND THE WORLD IS UNESTABLISHED WITH IT. Could we stay with the freedom of this being unestablished, savoring its flavor?”
….’Dynamics of Time and Space’, by Tarthang Tulku, p. 54-6 [Emphasis added]
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.